SHIVAJI PANDEY
Dular Chand Sah – Appellant
Versus
Devnath Sah – Respondent
Heard the parties.
2. In the present appeal the appellants are challenging the order dated 15.3.2013 passed by the 7th Sub-ordinate Judge, Bhojpur at Ara in Title Suit No.977 of 2012 by which he has rejected the injunction petition filed on behalf of the appellants under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for restraining the defendants Ist party and 6th party i.e. respondent Ist set and 4th set from alienating the suit property and also from making any construction thereupon.
3. Plaintiffs are the appellants who have filed Title Suit No.977 of 2012 for confirmation of family arrangement dated 10.12.1956 declaring the sale deed dated 14.11.2012 executed by defendant Ist party in favour of defendant 6th party in respect of the suit property described in Schedule “Ga” of the plaint to be illegal conferring no right, title and interest on the vendee, also for partition of the property described in Schedule “Kha” of the plaint in between the plaintiffs and defendant 4th party besides certain other reliefs.
4. It appears from the plaint that Bhajan Sah was the common ancestor of defendant Ist party and defendant IVth party. He had four sons
Union of India and others v. Vasavi Cooperative Housing Society Limited and others
Joseph John Peter Sandy v. Veronica Thomas Rajkumar and Another
Thiruvengada Pillai v. Navaneethammal and Another
Bhagwati Prasad Sah and others v. Dulhin Rameshwari Kuer and another
Raghubir Prasad and Another v. Amir Sah @ Amar Sah and others
Kanhaiyaji Sahay and others v. Kamla Prasad and another
Best Sellers Retail (India) Private Limited v. Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited and others
Kaliaperumal v. Rajagopal and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.