V. Nath, J.

Heard Mr. L.N. Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and also the sole respondent Ms. Seema Singh who has appeared in-person and has made her submissions.

2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for quashing the order dated 26.04.2013 passed in Matrimonial Case No. 398/2010 whereby the learned court below has enhanced the quantum of interim maintenance from Rs. 10,000/- to 12,000/- per month and allowed the amount of Rs. 20,000/- in lumpsum as admission fee of the daughter of the petitioner and the respondent. During the pendency of this application the interlocutory application (I.A. No. 430/2016) has been filed on 15.01.2016 praying for amendment in the main application by incorporating the relief for quashing the order dated 03.01.2015 passed in the aforesaid matrimonial case enhancing the amount of interim maintenance from Rs. 12,000/- to 15,000/- per month.

3. The facts in detail in dispute between the parties need no notice in view of the limited nature of the controversy in the present proceeding. Suffice it to state that the petitioner and the sole respondent are legally married couple