D.K.JAIN, C.K.THAKKER
SHAIL KUMARI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN BHAGWAN PATHAK @ KISHUN B. PATHAK – Respondent
Certainly. Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points summarized:
The primary consideration in maintenance cases is whether the wife was justified in living separately from her husband while still claiming maintenance (!) .
Effective Date of Maintenance:
The court must record reasons if it grants maintenance from the date of the application rather than the date of the order (!) (!) .
Interim Maintenance:
The law was amended to expressly authorize courts to grant interim maintenance, recognizing its importance for speedy relief (!) (!) .
Legal Provisions and Amendments:
The amendments also clarified that maintenance is payable from the date of the order or, if ordered, from the date of the application, with the court required to record reasons if deviating from the default (!) (!) .
Principles for Fixing Maintenance:
The court should consider all relevant facts, including property, inheritance, and income, when determining the quantum of maintenance (!) (!) .
Court’s Discretion and Record-Keeping:
Courts have discretion to award maintenance from either the date of the application or the date of the order, but reasons must be recorded if the date differs from the default (!) (!) .
Legal Interpretation:
The power to grant interim maintenance is implied and necessary for the effective operation of the law, even if not explicitly stated (!) (!) .
Specific Case Findings:
Please let me know if you need further elaboration or specific legal advice related to this document.
JUDGMENT
C.K. Thakker, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The present appeal is filed by appellant No. 1-wife and appellant No. 2-daughter of respondent herein-Krishan Bhagwan Pathak. The appellants have approached this Court being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna on May 3, 2007 in Criminal Revision No. 67 of 2007. By the said order, the High Court partly allowed the revision filed by the respondent-husband and modified the order passed by the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur on October 30, 2006 in Miscellaneous Case No. 280 of 1997, renumbered as No. 1 of 2005.
3. Shortly stated the facts of the case are that the marriage between appellant No. 1 and the respondent was solemnized according to Hindu rites, customs and ceremonies before more than three decades. From the said wedlock, nine children were born. Appellant No. 2-Kumari Babli is the youngest among all and she is the only child staying with her mother-appellant No. 1. At the time of filing of the application, she was of twelve years.
4. On July 21, 1997, the appellants filed a case for maintenance in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur under Section 125 of the Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.