SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Pat) 981

MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
Priyanka Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kaushal Kishor Gautam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Chandra Kant
For the Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Kumar

ORDER :

1. I have already heard the learned counsel, Mr. Chandra Kant for the petitioner and the learned counsel, Mr. Rakesh Kumar for the respondent.

2. This Civil Miscellaneous application has been filed by the wife-petitioner for setting aside the order dated 08.06.2016 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, West Champaran, Bettiah in Divorce Case No.138 of 2007 whereby the learned Court below rejected the application filed by the petitioner for recovery of arrears of maintenance amount of Rs.2,27,200 from the respondent-husband and till then stay of proceeding.

3. It appears that the husband-respondent filed the aforesaid divorce case under Section 12(i)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The cases of the parties are not required to be mentioned here. The wife appeared and is contesting the said case. During the pendency of the said divorce case, an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed by the wife who is petitioner herein. After hearing both the parties, the learned Family Court by order dated 26.06.2009 directed the husband-respondent herein to pay Rs.4,000 per month as maintenance and also Rs.15,000 lump sum as litigation cost.

4. This order dated 26.06.2












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top