SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 482

NILU AGRAWAL
Bipin Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Bimal Kumar, Birendra Kumar and Maruti Kumari, Advocates
For the Respondents: Md. Fahinuddin, APP

JUDGMENT :

Nilu Agrawal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel appearing for opposite party No. 2.

2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Cr.P.C.) for quashing of the order dated 13.06.2011, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in C.A. No. 1218/2010 whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Sections 147, 448, 379, 354, 498, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code with further prayer to quash further proceedings arising out of the aforesaid complaint case.

3. The brief facts of the case is that opposite party No. 2 Chamni Devi filed a complaint before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, alleging therein inter alia, that she is a poor lady and earns her livelihood working as a labourer. It is alleged that on 08.04.2010 at 12.00 P.M. the petitioners armed with weapons entered her house, abused her, destroyed her thatched house and on stopping them to do so they made her drink night soil and took Rs. 35,000/-. Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 tried to outrage her modesty and when her hus





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top