AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI, RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Nirmala Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
2. Appellant is the proprietor of one Shyam Chitra Mandir which is a Cinema Hall running at Chandra Gokul Road in the District of Gopalganj. She is aggrieved by the part of the order dated 26.11.2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No.9487 of 2012 by which the prayer of the writ petitioner-appellant for a direction to the respondent authorities to grant exemption from entertainment tax in view of the State Government’s policy has been refused.
Case of the writ petitioner-appellant.
3. The writ application was filed being aggrieved by the order/direction dated 24.04.2012 issued under the signature of Senior Deputy Collector, Gopalganj for sealing the Cinema Hall of the writ petitioner. It was the case of the writ petitioner-appellant that the Cinema Hall was sealed without considering the case of the writ-petitioner-appellant as no opportunity of hearing was given to her. The writ petitioner-appellant stated that she had filed application for renewal of licence of the Cinema Hall for the period 2010-11, but the same was not considered due to alleged non-payment of entertainment tax.
4. According to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.