V. NATH
Salim Hazam – Appellant
Versus
Mainu Nisa – Respondent
Heard Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Biond Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in the interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 3957/2017 and 3958/2017) along with supplementary affidavit filed in I.A.No.3958/2017.
2. in the interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 3957/2017 and 3958/2017) along with supplementary affidavit filed in I.A.No.3958/2017. In the interlocutory application (I.A.No.3958/2017) along with the supplementary affidavit filed thereto, the prayer has been made on behalf of the appellants to implead the two persons named therein as party respondents in the present appeal on the basis that they have purchased the part of the suit land by sale deed dated 28.03.2006, from the respondents during the pendency of the suit/appeal.
3. The interlocutory application (I.A.No.3957/2017) has been filed praying for grant of temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating, encumbering and changing the nature of the suit land and also for not disturbing the peaceful possession of the appellants and to maintain the status quo as existing till final disposal of the present appeal.
4. The matrix of facts, in sh
Arjun Singh Vs. Mahendra Singh
Choudhary Sahu (Dead) By LRS. Vs. State of Bihar
Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. United Industrial Bank Ltd.
Maharwal Khewaji Trust Vs. Baldev Dass
Moolchand Yadav Vs. Raza Buland Sugar Company
Smt. Rajnibai alias Mannubai Vs. Smt. Kamla Devi
Vidhur Impex and Traders (P) Ltd.Vs. Tosh Apartments (P) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.