SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 822

V. NATH
Salim Hazam – Appellant
Versus
Mainu Nisa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. W. Rahman, Adv., Mr. Ramanuj Tiwary, Adv.

ORDER :

Heard Mr. W. Rahman, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Biond Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in the interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 3957/2017 and 3958/2017) along with supplementary affidavit filed in I.A.No.3958/2017.

2. in the interlocutory applications (I.A. Nos. 3957/2017 and 3958/2017) along with supplementary affidavit filed in I.A.No.3958/2017. In the interlocutory application (I.A.No.3958/2017) along with the supplementary affidavit filed thereto, the prayer has been made on behalf of the appellants to implead the two persons named therein as party respondents in the present appeal on the basis that they have purchased the part of the suit land by sale deed dated 28.03.2006, from the respondents during the pendency of the suit/appeal.

3. The interlocutory application (I.A.No.3957/2017) has been filed praying for grant of temporary injunction restraining the respondents from alienating, encumbering and changing the nature of the suit land and also for not disturbing the peaceful possession of the appellants and to maintain the status quo as existing till final disposal of the present appeal.

4. The matrix of facts, in sh
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top