SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1313

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Nand Kishore Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Kumar.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Arun Kumar, Mr. Md. Hussamuddin Azad.

JUDGMENT :

1. It is surprising that counter-affidavit/rejoinder/supplementary counter-affidavit etc. have been filed by the parties for unjustifiable reason and the parties seem to have deviated from the main issue involved in the present case i.e. as to whether the order dated 04.09.2014 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sitamarhi, by which he has taken cognizance against the petitioners under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, is liable to be quashed or not?

2. The short facts of the case are that the Opposite Party No. 2 namely Hari Kishore Sinha had filed a Complaint Case No. 1262 of 2013 (C) of 2013 before the court of learned C.J.M. Sitamarhi against the petitioners herein and others, inter-alia, alleging therein that the father of the complainant namely late Ram Prasad Mahto and late Indrajeet Mahto were brothers and on 24.09.1971 their cousin grand-father late Jingur Mahto had given them 26 acres 11 decimals of land by Will. The said Jhingur Mahto had then died on account of illness on 21.10.1971. The father of the complainant and late Indrajeet Mahto, in the year 1977, with a view to prove the will had filed a case before the District Judge, Muzaf























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top