RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Ranveer Yadav son of Late Hari Ballabh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, Through The Secretary, Department of Home (police) – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel representing the State as also the learned counsel representing the private respondent no.5.
2. Petitioner has moved this Court for a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the letter no.1917 dated 19.09.2017 issued by the Superintendent of Divisional Jail, Khagaria in connection with Mansi (Chautham) P.S. Case No.192 of 1988 by which he has informed to the learned court below that the calculation done by the Superintendent of Divisional Jail, Munger regarding the period spent by the petitioner in custody in connection with this case is not correct and that the petitioner has not completed 10 years of custody and accordingly he cannot be released.
CASE OF THE PETITIONER
3. Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner in the present case was convicted by the learned trial court in this case vide Session Trial No.184/89 vide judgment and order dated 24.12.2016, he was sentenced to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 I.P.C. and also to pay a fine, but the said judgment of the learned trial court was later on set aside by a Division Bench of this Court in Cr. Ap
G.V. Godse v. State of Maharashtra, (1961)3 SCR 440
Government of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. Vs. Anne Venkatesware & Ors.
Harishchandra Prasad Vs. The State of Bihar
Kartar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Mathuramalingam & Ors. Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police
Ranjit Singh v. UT of Chandigarh
Rafiq Abdul Rehman v. State of Maharashtra
Raghbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.