SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 1045

JYOTI SARAN, NILU AGRAWAL
KAROO SAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Bindhyachal Singh, Adv., Satya Prakash, Adv., Ranjan Kumar Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

JYOTI SARAN, J.

1. This intra-court appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 17.11.2014, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWJC No. 16148 of 2013 whereby even while allowing the writ petition and holding the restoration of the service of the appellant/petitioner by the respondents as a 'reinstatement' and not a case of 're-appointment' and even while allowing him the benefit of past service of 21 years for the purpose of superannuation benefits, the learned Single Judge has denied the benefit of back wages to the appellant/petitioner and the reasons are missing therefor. This denial of back wages to the appellant/petitioner for the period he was kept out of service i.e. from 28.02.2003 until his reinstatement on 04.05.2012 by the learned Single Judge, which has aggrieved the appellant/ petitioner to move this Court through this present intra-court appeal which is limited to the issue of back wages.

2. We have heard Mr. Bindhayachal Singh, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/petitioner and Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned AC to PAAG-2 on behalf of the State and we have perused the record.

3. Before we would proceed to record our opinion on the
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top