SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Pat) 1215

RAKESH KUMAR, ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
Khedan Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Adv., Ajay Mishra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KUMAR, J.

1. The present appeal was preferred by sole appellant under Section 374(2) r/w Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.") against judgment of conviction and sentence passed in Sessions Trial No. 180 of 2012/25 of 2012 by Sri Ram Shankar Singh, learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge 3rd, Sitamarhi (hereinafter referred to as 'Trial Judge'). By judgment dated 20-03-2013, the learned Trial Judge has convicted the appellant for commission of offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'I.P.C.') and by order dated 22-03-2013 for commission of offence under Section 302 of the I.P.C., the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand). In default of payment of fine, he was directed to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.

2. Short fact of the case is that on 29-09-2011 at 00.30 hrs., one Sub-Inspector of Riga Police Station namely Sri Dhiraj Kumar Singh (not examined) recorded fardbeyan of Chulhai Ray (P.W.3) aged about 20 years son of Ram Bharos Ray (deceased) of village Basantpur Pakdi, P.S






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top