SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Pat) 1497

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
Secretary, Prakash B.Ed. Teachers Training College and Ors - Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar and Ors - Respondent
CWJC Nos. 10534 and 12496 of 2017
Decided On : 09-11-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajendra Prasad Singh, Mukesh Kumar Singh and Ravi Kumar Singh
For the Respondent: Shilpa Singh and Ranjan Kumar

Strict adherence to statutory provisions and prescribed procedures is necessary for the legality of decisions and integrity in the decision-making process.

Headnote:

Fees - Teacher Education - University Grants Commission (Regulation of Admission and Fees in Private Non-aided Professional Institutions) Regulations, 1997, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Regulation 11 of the National Council for Teacher Education (Guidelines for Regulation of Tuition Fees and Other Fees Chargeable by Unaided Teacher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2002

Fact of the Case:

The State Government fixed annual course fees for non-aided privately managed institutions offering Teacher Education programs. The petitioners challenged the decision, citing non-adherence to statutory provisions.

Finding of the Court:

The State Level Committee constituted by the State Government for fee fixation did not comply with the mandatory provisions of the University Grants Commission Regulations. The decision based on the committee's report was held illegal.

Issues: Non-compliance with statutory provisions in fixing course fees, constitution of the State Level Committee, and adherence to fee determination procedures.

Ratio Decidendi: Strict adherence to statutory provisions is necessary for integrity and consistency in decision-making. Exercise of power under statutory provisions must be in conformity with the prescribed procedure.

Final Decision: The impugned notification was quashed, and the State was directed to request the University Grants Commission to constitute a State Level Committee for fee determination in compliance with the regulations.

JUDGMENT :

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.

1. In the present two writ applications, challenge is to the decision of the State Government, whereby the course fees, chargeable by non-aided privately managed institutions, offering course of Training in Teacher Education have been fixed. The State Government, by the impugned notification has fixed annual fees at the rate of Rs. 50,000/- per student. Thus, the course fee for two-year programme, leading to B.Ed. Degree, which is a two-year course has been fixed at Rs. 1,00,000/-. The petitioners are non-aided privately managed institutions, offering courses/training in Teacher Education.

2. The challenge is on the ground that the State Government, while taking the decision, has not adhered to the mandatory statutory provisions prescribed in University Grants Commission (Regulation of Admission and Fees in Private Non-aided Professional Institutions) Regulations, 1997, read with National Council for Teacher Education (Guidelines for Regulation of Tuition Fees and Other Fees Chargeable by Unaided Teacher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2002, as amended from time to time. The teacher education programme, which these petitioners offer, admittedly, leads to University degree. There cannot be any dispute that these institutions are governed by the provisions of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993. The said National Council for Teacher Education (Guidelines for Regulation of Tuition Fees and Other Fees Chargeable by Unaided Teacher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2002, has been framed in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 12(h) read with Section 32(2) of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993. Regulation 11 of the said 2002 Regulations is at the core of the issue and is, therefore, being reproduced herein below:--

"11. Regulation of fees for teacher education programmes leading to a university degree.--For teacher education institutions and such other bodies offering a teacher education programme leading to a university degree, the provisions contained in the University Grants Commission (Regulation of Admission and Fees in Private Non-aided Professional Institutions) Regulations, 1997, as amended from time to time, will apply mutatis mutandis, subject to the condition that while determining the fee structure for a teacher education programme leading to a university degree, the Standing Committee of the University Grants Commission or the State Level Committee, as the case may be, will take into account the facilities required to be provided as per the NCTE Regulations laying down the norms and standards for the relevant teacher education programme."

3. It is evident from the said provision that the provisions contained in University Grants Commission (Regulation of Admission and Fees in Private Non-aided Professional Institutions) Regulations, 1997, shall have to be applied for regulation of the fees for teacher education programmes, leading to a University degree. It mandates that while determining the fee structure of teacher education programme, leading to a University degree, the Standing Committee of the University Grants Commission or the State Level Committee, as the case may be, will take into account the facilities required to be provided, as per the regulations laid down by the National Council for Teacher Education about the norms and standards for relevant teacher education programme.

4. Evidently thus, the provisions contained in University Grants Commission (Regulation of Admission and Fees in Private Non-aided Professional institutions) Regulations, 1997, are to be applied for determination of the fee structure of such institutions and the facilities required to be provided, as per the regulations of the National Council for Teacher Education, are to be taken into account for fixation of the fee structure.

5. This is to be noted that earlier the Chancellor, Universities of Bihar, had temporarily fixed the fees, chargeable by such i



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top