JYOTI SARAN, J.

1. Heard Mr. Vinay Ranjan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Md. N.H. Khan, learned SC-1, for the State.

2. With the consent of the parties the writ petition has been heard with a view to final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order bearing Memo No. 335 dated 19.2.2014 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Range Darbhanga in Departmental Proceeding No. 68/2012 as affirmed by the appellate authority i.e. Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga vide order bearing Memo No. 2417 dated 11.8.2014. Even the memorial of the petitioner has been dismissed vide order bearing Memo No. 6085 dated 10.8.2016 passed by the Addl. Secretary to the Government, Home (Police) Department. Copies of the order passed by the disciplinary authority, appellate authority as well as the State Government in rejecting the memorial are impugned at Annexure 21, 23 and 28 respectively to the writ petition.

4. Mr. Vinay Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner, has straightway invited the attention of this Court to the initiation of the proceedings vide Annexure 6 at Page-63 to submit that the