AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Dharmendra Kumar S/o Sri Saryug Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Ajay Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner has moved the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’) for the following relief:
“That, this is an application for quashing the order 11.03.11 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gaya in Complaint Case No. 256 of 2010/Tr. No. 1847/10 by which the learned Judicial Magistrate hold that prima facie case under sections 420, 120-B IPC is made out against the petitioner and others and accordingly ordered to issue process against them as well as for quashing the entire proceeding of aforesaid complaint case.”
3. The petitioner along with four others has been made accused by the opposite party no. 2 alleging that he had good terms with the opposite party no. 2 and had persuaded her to invest in Panjon Finance (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) and she had invested in the name of his minor son and the agreement was also executed between the parties on 14th January, 2006 and it was stipulated that shares would mature after four years when repayme
Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels & Tours (P) Ltd. reported as (2012) 5 SCC 661
HMT Watches Ltd. vs. M. A. Abida reported as 2015 (3) PLJR(SC) 25
Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd. reported as (2006) 6 SCC 736
R. Kalyani v. Janak C. Mehta reported as (2009) 1 SCC 516
M/s Medchi Chemicals & Pharma P. Ltd. v. M/s Biological E. Ltd. reported as 2000 (3) PLJR(SC) 56
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal reported as 1992 Supplementary (1) SCC 335
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.