Back
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Shiv Shankar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J. - At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is allowed to make correction in paragraph 1(III) of the prayer portion.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
3. Writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 19.2.2020 issued under the signature of the respondent no.5 and contained in his memo no. 187 dated 19.2.2020, whereby and whereunder he has been pleased to modify the date for grant of benefits of financial progression to the petitioners and has also directed for recovery on the ground that earlier the petitioners were granted the benefits of financial progression with effect from a date when they had not cleared their accounts examination.
(II) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.5.2020 issued under the signature of the respondent no.7 and contained in his letter no. 644 dated 12.5.2020 whereby and whereunder the respondent no.7 has been pleased to direct for withholding the salary of writ petitioners until their fixation of salary in terms o
Passing the departmental accounts examination is not a condition precedent for the grant of A.C.P./M.A.C.P. benefits.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
