SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 7

ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Raju Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate, Amaresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate, Shailendra Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ashutosh Kumar, J. - Heard Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned Advocate for the petitioner/revisionist and Mr. Amaresh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Railways/opposite party No. 2. The State is represented by Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned Advocate.

2. This criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 09.09.2019 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, POCSO & SC/ST, West Champaran at Bettiah in Cr. Appeal No. 27 of 2016, whereby he has affirmed the judgment and conviction of the petitioner/revisionist, but has enhanced the sentence to two years and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 143 of Railways Act, 1989 (in short the Act) as also the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Railways, Narkatiaganj, Bettiah in Trial No. 0378 of 2016 arising out of RPF (Raxaul) Complaint Case No. 224 of 2009, which had sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 5,000/- for the offence under Section 143 of the Act. In default of payment of fine, the petitioner/revisionist was directed to suffer simple imprisonment for three months.

3. The petitioner/rev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top