IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.
Pankaj Kumar Son of Ram Nandan Vishwakarma - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7661 of 2020
Decided On : 04-01-2021
EBC Category - Reservation Denial - Bihar Public Service Commission - Clause 7(ii)(B) - Caste Certificate, Non-creamy Layer Certificate, Domicile Certificate - The court discussed the requirement of non-creamy layer certificate for claiming reservation against EBC category, the petitioner's failure to submit the certificate, and the legal provisions related to submission of documents for reservation. The court also considered the impact of a communication issued by the General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, and the petitioner's request for mandamus to issue a non-creamy layer certificate. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the terms and conditions mentioned in the advertisement and the stipulated selection procedure.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, belonging to the Lohar community, sought reservation as an EBC candidate for the post of Lecturer in Arts and Craft. The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) required submission of non-creamy layer certificate for claiming reservation against EBC category. The petitioner failed to submit the certificate and subsequently filed a writ application seeking mandamus to issue the certificate.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the petitioner's application, emphasizing that the absence of the non-creamy layer certificate disentitled the petitioner from being considered for the posts reserved for EBC category. The court also declined to go into the correctness of the communication dated 08.08.2016, stating that the petitioner did not raise any grievance questioning the communication at the appropriate time.
Issues: The main issue involved the petitioner's claim for reservation as an EBC candidate without possessing the non-creamy layer certificate. The court also considered the impact of a communication issued by the General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, and the petitioner's request for mandamus to issue a non-creamy layer certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the terms and conditions mentioned in the advertisement and the stipulated selection procedure. It highlighted the requirement of non-creamy layer certificate for claiming reservation against EBC category and the legal principles related to submission of documents for reservation.
Final Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's application, stating that the absence of the non-creamy layer certificate disentitled the petitioner from being considered for the posts reserved for EBC category.
JUDGMENT :
1. Whether the respondent Bihar Public Service Commission was justified in considering petitioner’s candidature against an open (unreserved) vacancy of the post of Lecturer in the subject of Arts and craft for various Training College in the State of Bihar and thus denying him the benefit of reservation available for Extremely Backward Class, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, is the only question which the present writ application involves.
2. The petitioner claims that he belongs to Lohar community, which was recognized as Extremely Backward Class (EBC). The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) came out with an advertisement No. 04/2016 in May, 2016 inviting applications for selection for appointment to the post of Lecturers in the subject of Arts and Craft in various Government Training Colleges. A total number of 26 vacancies were advertised. Five out of 26 vacancies were reserved for EBC category. Clause 7 of the advertisement related to reservation in the matter of selection process in question. Clause 7(ii)(B) of the advertisement clearly mentioned that candidates claiming reservation against the Backward Class category and EBC category shall have to essentially submit following documents, namely : -
(a) Caste Certificate;
(b) Non-creamy Layer Certificate; and
(c) Domicile Certificate.
3. It further mentioned that original certificates for claiming reservation in the matter of selection must be produced at the time of interview, else the benefit of reservation shall not be admissible. 6th June, 2016 was the last date for submission of application forms.
4. The petitioner claims that he had submitted Caste Certificate dated 07.09.2015 acknowledging his status as a member of EBC category. It is admitted fact that the petitioner did not submit the creamy layer certificate along with his caste certificate as was stipulated in the advertisement to be essentially required.
5. The petitioner participated in the examination held on 26.08.2018, result of which was published by the BPSC on 26.04.2020. The petitioner was declared successful. He participated in the interview held on 23.06.2020. In the interview letter issued by the BPSC also, it was clearly mentioned that the candidates claiming selection on the basis of reservation must submit the original ‘non-creamy layer certificate’, else benefit of reservation would not be admissible.
6. The final result was published on 04.07.2020. The petitioner’s name did not figure in the list of selected candidates. It is not in dispute that the petitioner secured 69.48 marks, whereas cut off marks for unreserved category was fixed at 71.766 and that for the EBC category was fixed at 64.450. It is the petitioner’s case that merely because he had failed to submit non-creamy layer certificate at the time of submission of application and at the time of interview his claim of belonging to EBC category for the purpose of reservation cannot be denied.
7. Till date the petitioner does not have non-creamy layer certificate to establish his claim for reservation against a vacancy reserved for EBC.
8. It has been stated in the writ petition that the petitioner failed to submit the non-creamy layer certificate along with the application form as the said certificate could not be obtained due to paucity of time. It is noted here that there is no averment in the writ application to the effect that any step was taken to obtain the non-creamy layer certificate.
9. There are certain events which followed subsequent to submission of application form by the petitioner because of which the petitioner has not been able to obtain non-creamy layer certificate, in the background of which the petitioner has filed present writ application seeking mandamus to the respondents to issue in his favour a non-creamy layer certificate. Before referring to the relief which the petitioner has sought for, the said developments subsequent to submission of application form are being taken note of.
Shashi Bhushan Yadav vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Dheerender Singh Paliwal v. UPSC
Prabhat Kumar Sharma v. Union Public Service Commission
Dr. Santosh Kumar vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.
Bedanga Talukdar v. Saifudaullah Khan
Tar Babu Yadav v. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.