SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Anil Kumar Sinha, J.
Mantu Kumar Singh - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors. - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10452 of 2019
Decided On : 26-10-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Harshvardhan Shivsundaram, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC8), for the Respondent.

Headnote:

Bihar Home Guards Service Rules, 2005 – Rule 5 (iii) – Cancellation of advertisement for selection/Nomination of Home Guards – Respondent authorities are not permitted to take advantage of their own fault in completing selection process within a reasonable time period and are also not permitted to take a plea of change in eligibility criteria due to subsequent amendment as a ground for cancellation of Advertisement – Though no reason for cancellation of Advertisement has been assigned in impugned letter, however, respondent authorities tried to justify decision of District Magistrate on the ground that during pendency of selection process there was change in eligibility criteria in respect to educational qualification, age and reservation – Selection process for nomination of Home Guards in various other districts pursuant to same Advertisement has started and completed recently – Subsequent amendment in Rules during pendency of selection process cannot be taken as a ground for cancellation of advertisement – Decision to cancel Advertisement impugned letter quashed and Selection Committee headed by District Magistrate directed to complete selection / nomination process of Home Guards strictly as per terms and conditions prescribed in Advertisement. (Paras 10 to 13)

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ application has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to complete the selection / nomination process of Home Guards in the Bhojpur District pursuant to Advertisement No. 1 / 2006 and 2 / 2011 issued by the Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. The petitioner subsequently filed an interlocutory application bearing LA. No. 1 of 2019 for quashing the Memo No. 383 dated 15.02.2019 by which the District Magistrate has cancelled the Advertisement No. 01 / 2006 & 02 / 2011 for selection / nomination of the Home Guards. The aforesaid interlocutory application was allowed by this court vide order dated 22-06-2021.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present writ application is that the Home Department, Govt. of Bihar issued Advertisement No. 1 / 2006 inviting applications from eligible candidates for selection / nomination / enrollment on the roll of Home Guards in different districts of Bihar including the Bhojpur district, however, without completing the aforesaid selection process, the respondent- Home Department, Govt. of Bihar came out with fresh advertisement bearing Advertisement No. 02/2011 for selection / nomination of Home Guards in various districts including the district of Bhojpur. The total vacancies for nomination of Home Guards advertised vide Advertisement No. 02 / 2011 was 220. The age limit prescribed for selection / nomination was between 19 years to 40 years with minimum educational qualification prescribed was Standard-V. The selection / nomination process was to be conducted at the district level for which a Selection Committee was constituted in every district under Rule 5 (4) of the Bihar Home Guards Rules, 1953. The District Magistrate was nominated as the Chairman of the Selection Committee and the Superintendent of Police, District Commandant (Home Guards) and District Welfare Officer were nominated as members of the Selection Committee.

3. The last date for submission of application was fixed as 30-07-2011 and the petitioner being fully eligible for selection / nomination submitted his application before the concerned authority within time and was given acknowledgment receipt bearing SI. No. 815. The petitioner being aggrieved by delay in completing the process of selection / nomination filed a complaint before the District Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Bhojpur (for short "Redressal Officer") on 28/09/2018. The Redressal Officer called for a report from the concerned authority and in response thereto Sr. Deputy Collector, General Section, Bhojpur reported vide letter no. 2233 dated 01-11-2018 that necessary steps are being taken for completing the selection process. He further reported that with respect to Advertisement No. 02 / 2011 roster has been sent to the District Magistrate, Bhojpur for approval and process of nomination would be completed shortly. Taking into consideration the said reports, the Redressal Officer, Bhojpur passed the final order on 05/01/2019 (Annexure-P/5) directing the concerned public authorities to take necessary steps in this matter and to inform the Redressal Officer within thirty days, however, the respondents, particularly respondent - District Magistrate, Bhojpur did not take any step within the aforesaid period of thirty days given by the Redressal Officer. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna and taking into consideration the fact that the District Magistrate, Bhojpur has cancelled the Advertisement No. 01 / 2006 and 02/2011 and has directed for issuance of fresh advertisement, the Commissioner Patna Division dropped the proceedings.

4. Per contra, a counter affidavit as well as supplementary counter affidavits have been filed by the respondent /State stating therein that Advertisement No. 01 / 2006 was advertised for inviting applications from eligible candidates for selection and nomination of Home Guards in Bhojpur district of Bihar to fill up 301 vacancies but one

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top