SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 738

ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Mantu Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Harshvardhan Shivsundaram, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC8), for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ application has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to complete the selection / nomination process of Home Guards in the Bhojpur District pursuant to Advertisement No. 1 / 2006 and 2 / 2011 issued by the Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. The petitioner subsequently filed an interlocutory application bearing LA. No. 1 of 2019 for quashing the Memo No. 383 dated 15.02.2019 by which the District Magistrate has cancelled the Advertisement No. 01 / 2006 & 02 / 2011 for selection / nomination of the Home Guards. The aforesaid interlocutory application was allowed by this court vide order dated 22-06-2021.

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present writ application is that the Home Department, Govt. of Bihar issued Advertisement No. 1 / 2006 inviting applications from eligible candidates for selection / nomination / enrollment on the roll of Home Guards in different districts of Bihar including the Bhojpur district, however, without completing the aforesaid selection process, the respondent- Home Department, Govt. of Bihar came out with fresh advertisement bearing Advertisement No. 02/2011 for selection / nomination of Home

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top