SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Mohit Kumar Shah, J.
Jainendra Kumar - Appellant
Versus
The State Of Biharthrough The Principal Secretary & Ors. - Respondent
C.W.J.C. No. 23258 of 2019
Decided On : 04-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Arvind Kr. Singh,Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv., Mr. Mrigendra Kumar (AC to GP 20), for the Respondent.

Headnote:

University Law – Appointment – Post of Assistant Professor – It is contention of petitioner that he has been awarded M. Phil degree as per U.G.C. Regulations, 2009, hence he should be awarded 04 marks whereas on the contrary, respondent-B.P.S.C. is of the view that petitioner has been awarded M. Phil degree without complying with Regulations, 2009 – As per U.G.C. Regulations, 2009, M. Phil degree is required to be awarded in consonance and in compliance of Regulations 5 to 20 of U.G.C. Regulations, 2009, whereas admittedly, certificate issued to petitioner dated 18.05.2018, by Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi, does not show that Regulations No. 6, 7, 9 (IV), 15 and 19 have been followed while awarding M. Phil degree to petitioner, hence respondent-B.P.S.C. has rightly granted 02 marks instead of 04 marks to petitioner – Petition dismissed. (Paras 5 and 6)

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent- Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter to be referred to as the "B.P.S.C.") to grant 04 more marks to the petitioner in the selection process being undertaken for making appointment on the post of Assistant Professor, pursuant to the Advertisement no. 50 of 2014, in view of the fact that the petitioner possesses M. Phil degree as per the U.G.C. Regulations, 2009 with NET.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent-B.PS.C. published an advertisement bearing Advertisement no. 50 of 2014 for filling up vacancies on the post of Assistant Professor in different subjects, in pursuance whereof, the petitioner had also applied for the post of Assistant Professor in Hindi subject. The petitioner is stated to have acquired his M. Phil Degree from Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi in the year 2014 in Hindi subject. The petitioner, having been found eligible, was selected for interview and he was placed at serial no. 962 in the list of eligible candidates, however in front of the name of the petitioner, in the said list of eligible candidates, it was mentioned that though the petitioner has passed NET and obtained M. Phil degree but the M. Phil degree is without U.G.C. Regulations, 2009. The petitioner had then sent his documents to the B.P.S.C. by E-mail, regarding him having obtained M. Phil Degree in Hindi as per the U.G.C. Regulations, 2009 and had requested the B.P.S.C. to correct his status in the list of eligible candidates by mentioning the same as NET + M. Phil as per the U.G.C. Regulations, 2009. Thereafter, an interview letter was issued to the petitioner and he had appeared in the interview, however he was not selected finally, which the petitioner came to know after the final result was published on 12.02.2019 by the B.P.S.C.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has obtained M. Phil degree from Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi and it would be apparent from the certificate dated 18.05.2018, issued by the Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi that the petitioner fulfils the Minimum Standard and Procedures for the completion and award of M.Phil Degree in accordance with the then existing ordinance of the University and the provisions of the U.G.C. Regulations, 2009. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also referred to the certificate dated 03.03.2017, issued by the Assistant Registrar of the Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi, where it has been certified that the petitioner has successfully completed M.Phil Programme in the year 2014 and the process of admission, registration, course-work and evaluation were followed as prescribed by the U.G.C. Regulations, 2009 with regard to the award of degree of the said programme by the Jawahar Lal Nehru University, New Delhi. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that a bare perusal of the advertisement under the heading 'Educational Qualification' at Clause 3 would show that the candidates who have obtained Ph.D. degree on the basis of Minimum Standard and Procedures Regulations, 2009, framed by the University Grants Commission for M.Phil/ Ph.D. degree, shall be exempted from passing the NET exam. It is thus submitted that since the petitioner has already passed the NET exam, he should have been granted 04 more marks as per Sl. No. 3 of Schedule V to the aforesaid Advertisement which stipulates that 04 marks should be given to such candidates who possess M.Phil degree as per U.G.C. Regulations, 2009 with NET. It is also submitted that since the petitioner is possessing M.Phil degree as per U.G.C. Regulations, 2009 and has also passed NET, he is entitled to 04 marks and if the petitioner is granted 04 more marks, he would definitely qualify as a successful candidate. In any view of the matter, it is submitted that as per the terms and conditions mentioned under the heading "Educational Qualification", the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top