SANJAY KAROL, S.KUMAR
Vijay Kumar Singh, Son of Shiv Sagar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s :
(ii) The respondents simultaneously may kindly be directed to replace the above said incorporation as just, fair, rational and reasonable stipulation for providing the constitutional protection under Article 14, 16 and 21 be made available to petitioners and other Non-formal Education Instructors-cum-Special Education Instructors, who are/were validly appointed, bonafidely worked and entitle for job/absorption within four corners of law coupled with illegibility and experience criteria, which they having admittedly.
(iii) For directing the respondent to consider the petitioners candidature/cause in view of well settled preposition of law as stated hereunder :-
(a) “Justice must not only be done, but it must also be seen to be done”, since reported in (1924) 1 KB 256 (i.e. Rex. Vs. Sussex Justices case) and other cases.
(b) “A reasonless order cannot be termed as an ord
Commissioner Income Tax Vs. Sun Engineering
D.N. Jeevaraj Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Karnataka & Ors
Dr.V.V. Sai Naresh and another Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Dhiraj Singh Vs. State of Haryana
K.T. Retire Official Association Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors
R&M Trust v. Koramangala Residents Vigilance Group
Shershiri Vs. The State of Karnataka)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.