SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 216

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, MADHURESH PRASAD, JJ.
Anju Devi Wife of Ramesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17044, 17251, 18237 of 2021
Decided on : 17-01-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. S.B.K. Manglam, Advocate Mr. Awnish Kumar
For the Respondent:Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh (GA3), Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate

Headnote:

Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 – Sections 2(59) read with Section 6 and 12(8) – Constitution of India – Article 243U – Constitution of new municipal Area and competence of State Government to designate an Administrator in place of Board of Administrators – Administrator is 'an officer appointed by State Government' to exercise powers and performance of duties conferred or imposed on municipalities, Empowered Standing Committee and Chief Executive Officer by or under the Act – It is not the petitioner's case that they are officers appointed by State Government – They are elected representatives and not officers appointed by State Government – State Government may by notification appoint 'such person' or 'such persons' to be designated as an Administrator or Board of Administrators – Expression "such person" or "such persons" can only mean an officer or officers appointed by State Government and cannot mean an elected representative or elected representatives – This provision of Act also does not cast any statutory obligation on State to appoint (persons) to be designated as an Administrator, or as Board of Administrators – No material has been shown to establish any legal right of petitioners to continue as office bearers/representatives of their respective local bodies, which right can be said to have been infringed by impugned action of State Government – Six months' duration has been given to local authorities having jurisdiction over such a municipal area newly constituted, which may be necessary for holding elections – Petitioners have not raised any grievance in relation to inability to hold elections of newly constituted local bodies areas as stipulated in sub-section (8) of Section 12 of Act – They rather want to continue to be a part of body administering municipal area – In view of clear language of sub-section (8) of Section 12 of Act, it is legally impermissible to allow petitioners to continue any more as office bearers or representatives of erstwhile municipal areas, which subsequently come to be upgraded – State Election Commission must ensure early holding of election to municipal bodies – Writ Applications dismissed. (Paras 21, 26, 28 and 30)

JUDGMENT

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, JJ

1. The consequence of constitution of new municipal area within the meaning of Section 2(59) read with Section 6 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 (Act in short) apropos jurisdiction of the local authority over such area immediately before constitution of such area after lapse of six months, by operation of Section 12(8) of the Act is the primordial issue, which these three writ applications involve. Competence of the State Government to designate an ‘Administrator’ in place of ‘Board of Administrators’ in exercise of power under Section 12(9) of the Act is another issue, which the petitioners have raised in the present batch of cases.

2. As all these matters involve identical legal issues and are founded on similar set of facts, with the consent of the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by the present common judgment and order.

3. We have heard Mr. P.K.Sahi and Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned Senior Counsel and Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, learned G.A.-3 representing the State of Bihar and Mr. Girish Pandey and Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, learned counsel for the State Election Commission.

4. Keeping in view the nature of controversy and the submissions, which have been advanced on behalf of the parties, it has been considered apt to notice at the very outset sub-sections (8) and (9) of Section 12 of the Act and Article 243U of the Constitution of India :

    Section 12(8) and Section 12(9) of the Act

“12. (8) In a municipal area newly constituted, the local authority having jurisdiction over such area immediately before such area was constituted as a municipal area, shall continue to have jurisdiction and to perform its functions till such time, not exceeding six months from the date of the notification under Section 6, as may be necessary for holding elections.

(9) If, for any reason, it is not possible to hold the general election of a Municipality before the expiry of the period of five years specified in sub-section (5), the Municipality shall stand dissolved on the expiration of the said period, and all the powers and functions vested in the municipal authorities under this Act or under any other law for the time being in force shall be exercised or performed, as the case may be, by such person or persons to be designated as Administrator or Board of Administrators as the State Government may, by notification, appoint.

Article 243-U of the Constitution : Duration of Municipalities, etc.—(1) Every Municipality, unless sooner dissolved under any law for the time being in force, shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer:

Provided that a Municipality shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard before its dissolution.

(2) No amendment of any law for the time being in force shall have the effect of causing dissolution of a Municipality at any level, which is functioning immediately before such amendment, till the expiration of its duration specified in clause (1).

(3) An election to constitute a Municipality shall be completed,—

(a) before the expiry of its duration specified in clause (1);

(b) before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of its dissolution:

Provided that where the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Municipality would have continued is less than six months, it shall not be necessary to hold any election under this clause for constituting the Municipality for such period.

(4) A Municipality constituted upon the dissolution of a Municipality before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Municipality would have continued under clause (1) had it not been so dissolved.”

(underlined for emphasis)

5. C.W.J.C. No. 17044 of 20201 pertains to constitution of Motihari Nagar Nigam in place of Motihari Nagar Parishad; Sheohar Nagar Parishad in place of Sheohar Nagar Panchayat; Bettia

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top