JUDGMENT :

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S. B. K. Manglam and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent-State, Md. Abbas Haider (SC-6).

2. The present writ petition was though filed initially for quashing the recommendation made by the Respondents No. 8 and 9 for Constitution of Bihta Nagar Parishad as also for quashing the draft notification issued by the Respondent No. 2 dated 26.12.2020 published in the daily Hindi newspaper Dainik Jagran dated 27.12.2020 whereby and whereunder the State Government had invited objections against its intention of Constituting the Bihta Nagar Parishad, comprising of group of villages, as mentioned therein, but during the pendency of the present writ petition, the final notification has been issued by the State Government under Section 6 of the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007 vide memo dated 03.03.2021, under the signature of the Joint Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, whereby and whereunder Bihta Nagar Parishad has been constituted, hence, now, the same is also sought to be challenged in the present proceedings inasmuch as this Court, by an order dated 16.07.2021, had allowed the am