IN THE HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Shivaji Pandey, J.
Bibi Rashida Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar and Others – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20209 of 2016
Decided On : 28-01-2021
Bihar Government Servant's Conduct Rules, 1976 – Rule 23 – Family Pension – Entitlement – Petitioner is second wife of deceased employee – When first wife has already died, question of deprivation of family pension to petitioner does not arise as on date of death of employee petitioner was only wife of her husband – Respondents directed to make payment of family pension including arrears of amount to petitioner within a period of four weeks. (Paras 4 and 5)
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned Counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.
2. In the present case, issue has been raised with regard to entitlement of family pension. The petitioner was married to Md. Sultan during the lifetime of his first wife namely, Bibi Kusum. From the record, it appears that the husband of the petitioner superannuated from the service on 30.06.1983 and he entered into the marriage with the petitioner on 19.01.1984. Admittedly, the second marriage was solemnized after superannuation of Md. Sultan. Rule-23 of the Bihar Government Servant's Conduct Rules, 1976, provides and prescribes that during the lifetime of first wife, the employee would not enter into the second marriage but, this Rule would apply so long he is in service, after superannuation, he ceased to be a Government servant, save and except, his governance for pension under the Bihar Pension Rules.
3. From the record, it appears that first wife of Md. Sultan died on 05.11.2003 and Md. Sultan died on 05.09.2005, so during the lifetime of husband, the first wife died. It has been complaint that the petitioner has been deprived of family pension on the plea that as the first wife is not alive, the petitioner being second wife of Md. Sultan, is not entitled to family pension placing reliance on the Resolution No. 1549 dated 24.06.2011.
4. As the husband of the petitioner had died in the year 2005 and this Resolution has come into force in the year 2011 so, it cannot be given retrospectively. Even presuming that it is applicable, in that circumstance also, she cannot be deprived of family pension as Clause-3 of the aforesaid Resolution provides, in the event of first wife is alive, family pension will be divided 50-50. When first wife has already died, the question of deprivation of family pension to the petitioner does not arise as on the date of death of Md. Sultan the petitioner was the only wife of her husband.
5. In such view of the matter, this Court gives direction to the respondents to make payment of family pension including the arrears of amount to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from the date of production / receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is allowed.
Pension is a protected right under Article 300-A of the Constitution; denial of family pension to a legally wedded second wife without due process violates principles of natural justice.
On death of legally wedded wife, who is not survived by any child eligible to receive pension, share of family pension to her stream would not lapse, but would be payable to eligible children from ot....
Family pension is payable only to the legally wedded spouse of an employee, and second marriage during the lifetime of the first spouse makes the petitioner ineligible for family pension under the pe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.