SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 975

SHIVAJI PANDEY
Ajab Lal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Labh.
For the Respondent: Mr. U.P. Singh, AC to SC.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In this case, the petitioner is challenging the order contained in Memo No. 307 dated 20.2.2015 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Banka, whereby and where under, the license of the Fair Price Shop bearing No. 01/09 has been canceled assigning reason that at the time of joint inspection, the shop was found closed. The petitioner filed an appeal being Appeal Case No. 132 of 2015-16 before the Collector, Banka but, the same was rejected by the appellate authority vide order dated 18.5.2018 and claiming that both the orders suffer from irregularity, requires interference of this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the particular date of inspection i.e. on 3.2.2015, the shop was found closed and the same cannot be treated gross irregularity which would entail the cancellation of the license.

4. The short fact of this case is that the petitioner is a license holder for running Fair Price Shop issued under the Bihar Fair Price Shop Order, 2007. The Block Development Officer, Banka made a joint inspection on 3.2.2015 and found the shop closed without any intimation or displaying in the notice board. A show-cau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top