SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 912

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Ishak Miya @ Ishak Mahmmad Miya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sanjay Kumar No 7, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil Kumar, AC

JUDGMENT :

1. The office notes as regards the deposit of cost is unwarranted. That was a conditional order. The State has already filed the additional counter affidavit.

2. The present writ application was initially filed seeking quashing of the order dated 16.01.2019 contained in letter no. 24 issued by the District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah (respondent no. 2) directing to conduct a departmental proceeding through the Additional Collector (Departmental Enquiry) West Champaran, Bettiah against the petitioner. The petitioner also prayed for a direction to the respondents to consider revoking his suspension and appoint him on his regular post.

3. During pendency of the writ application since final order has been passed by the disciplinary authority and a decision has been taken to terminate the petitioner from service, the petitioner has, after seeking leave of this Court, challenged the order of termination by filing an Interlocutory Application No. 01 of 2020. The petitioner has, thus, challenged the final order as contained in Memo No. 804 dated 16.07.2020 issued unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top