SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1085

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Nagendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s P.K.Sahi, Sr. Adv., Mukesh Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Sadanand Paswan.

ORDER

Heard Mr. P.K.Sahi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Sadanand Paswan, learned Special Public Prosecutor.

2. This appeal has been preferred under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for setting aside an order dated 21.01.2020 passed in Special Case No. 58 of 2019, arising out of Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 1383 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(i)(xi), 3(2)v of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 passed by the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act)-cum-Additional District & Sessions Judge 1st, Nawada, whereby the prayer of the appellant for grant of regular bail has been rejected.

3. The informant has alleged in his written report, which is the basis for registration of the First Information Report that when the informant’s six-year old daughter was on her way back home from school, the appellant, under some allurement, took her to his house and touched the private parts of her body. When she started weeping, she was allowed by the appellant to go back to h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top