THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, ANIRUDDHA ROY
Ganesh Das – Appellant
Versus
Rabiul Sk – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, C.J. - Is the victim a necessary party to an appeal, under Section 374 of Cr.P.C., from conviction? Would such an appeal be defective in the absence of impleadment of the victim? If the answers to these two questions are in the negative, what is the procedure to be adopted?
2. Cra No. 228 of 2020 is an appeal against conviction and sentence. The appellant was held guilty and convicted for offence punishable under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code; hereinafter referred to as "I.P.C."; and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; for short, "POCSO Act". He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 years and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable under Section 376(3) of I.P.C. It was directed that the victim is entitled to get the said fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- if realized, in view of the second proviso to Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; for short, "Cr.P.C.". The department has noted that this appeal is defective as the victim has not been made party in this application (appeal).
3. Cra No. 26 of 2021 is als
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.