S. KUMAR, J.:–I.A. Nos.1, 3 and 4 filed on behalf of petitioner are allowed and shall form part of this writ petition.

C.W.J.C. No.7160 of 2020:

2. Petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:—

(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of certiorari by quashing the order as contained under Letter No.1606/D dated 06.06.2020, whereby and wherunder the representation dated 19.03.2020 submitted by petitioner along with project report has been rejected on nonest ground and without affording the reasonable opportunity of hearing to it.

(ii) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authority to allow the petitioner to move on with the project in the industrial interest of the State of Bihar.

(iii) For declaration that the impugned order of rejection dated 06.06.2020 takes away the fundamental right of petitioner to establish industry as guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

(iv) For quashing of notice dated 31.07.2020 (Annexure-7 to the writ application) published by BIADA in local dailies to comply the directions given in the said notice within 15 days otherwise action shall be taken in accordance with law.

(v) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders direction/directions for quashing the office order as contained under memo no.2447/D dated 19.08.2020, by which the diversification proposal submitted by petitioner has been rejected and allotment of land has been cancelled without serving any show cause notice in this regard.

(vi) For quashing of order contained in Memo No.3562/D dated 26.11.2020 (Annexure-14) issued by the Executive Director, BIADA, Patna whereby and whereunder the diversification proposal submitted by the petitioner has been rejected and allotment of land has been cancelled.

(vii) For any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is entitled in present facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. Petitioner’s company was allotted land measuring 1,01,216 square feet appertaining to plot Nos.A/4 and A/5 of the industrial area, Patliputra, Patna for establishment of sheet metal components for automobiles, railway and telecommunication along with their casting industry.

4. Petitioner’s company as an ancillary unit of TELCO manufactured the automobile part but after bifurcation of State of Bihar in the year 2000 and due to change in policy of TELCO, the manufacturing activity of petitioner’s company stopped after being in operation for more than three decades.

5. The respondent authorities in a cyclostyle order that it had not established industry, cancelled the allotment and registration of the petitioner along with others vide order dated 14.12.2006.

6. Petitioner’s company against the order of cancellation, filed writ petition being CWJC No.7359 of 2007 and this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 17.03.2008 allowed the writ petition along with other analogs cases and the allotment of land and lease deed was restored in favour of petitioner’s company, subject to outcome of LPA, S.L.P.

7. The respondent authorities filed an appeal being LPA No.353 of 2008 (BIADA and others Vs. Deepak Paints Private Limited and other analogous cases) and this Hon’ble Court disposed of the application with liberty to petitioner and other similarly placed industrial units for diversification of its project, which reads as follows:—

“Under these circumstances, we dispose of the appeals by modifying the order passed by the learned single Judge to the following effect:

(A) The orders of cancellation of leases or allotment of the land to the respondents herein shall stand set aside, but they are given six months time from today either to establish the industries, wherever they are not established, or to revive the industries, if they were already established, but have become sick.

(B) If any of the respondents, i.e. the writ petitioners, intend to go for diversification, any application in tha