SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 505

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Raj Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Prakritita Sharma.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Saurabh Kumar.

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.:–The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 29.5.2015, passed by the Additional Inspector General of Registration, Patna, i.e. the respondent No. 4 herein, in Case No. 21/2014 whereby and whereunder by an ex parte order, the reference made by the registering authority regarding valuation and deficit stamp duty has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to pay deficit stamp duty to the tune of Rs. 19,48,800/- along with fine of Rs. 1,94,880/-. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the letter dated 04.06.2015, issued by the respondent No. 4, raising a demand of Rs. 21,43,680/-, upon the petitioner.

2. The brief facts of the case according to the petitioner are that the vendors Rajan Tiwari @ Ajay Kumar and others jointly advertised for the sale of their land at Thana no. 155, computer code-036, khata no. 316, khesra survey plot no. 1164, 1165, 1166, 1167 and 1168, area 1 acre and 56 decimals, equal to nearly 50 khatas, situated in Mauza- Govindpur Selhauri, P.S.-Naubatpur, District- Patna, in pursuance to which the petitioner showed interest and the matter was finalized for sale at the rate of Rs. 12,000/- per katha and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top