ARUN KUMAR JHA, J.:–Since both the aforesaid appeals arise out from Balia P.S. Case No. 115 of 2021, as such, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State.

3. Though Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of respondent no.2/informant, but none is present on his behalf.

4. Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from the date of resumption of physical filing and physical removal of defect.

5. Both the appeals under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 have been filed against the refusal of prayer for bail by orders dated 29.09.2021 and 02.11.2021, respectively passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Begusarai in connection with Balia P.S. Case No. 115 of 2021, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 120(B)/34 the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

6. As per the prosecution case, the appellants and other co-accused persons called out the informant through the co-accused Lagma Khatoon and assaulted h