SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 666

MADHURESH PRASAD
Krishna Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kumod Kumar Shrivastaw.
For the State of Bihar : Mr. Durgesh Nandan.

Madhuresh Prasad, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AAG- XIV representing the State of Bihar.

2. The petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 11.06.2019 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna as contained in Annexure- 5 to the writ petition, directing deduction of 10% of his pension for five (05) years. The impugned order of punishment is pursuant to a charge memo dated 07.04.2017, as contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition, issued post the petitioner’s retirement on 30.06.2013.The charges on ‘Prapatra -Ka’ are in relation to the petitioner’s services as Junior Engineer while posted in the Minor Irrigation Division, Madhubani. The statement of imputation of misconduct is that a Flying Squad made some inspection of 50 irrigation Schemes. The findings of Flying Squad was that the payment had been made to the Contractor based on bill prepared in accordance with the Measurement Book, wherein, 50 Surge tanks were shown to be made of 8mm thickness plate whereas the Flying Squad found the Surge tank to be made of 3 mm thickness plate. This lapse allegedly caused loss of Government revenue. The petitioner has respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top