Sunita Devi vs State of Bihar - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 575

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Pat) 575

MADHURESH PRASAD
Sunita Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Rajendra Narayan, Sr. Adv, Anant Kumar Sinha.
For the State : Mr. S.K.Mandal.
For the Resp. No.7 : Mr. S.P. Parasar.

Madhuresh Prasad, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the private respondent No.7 and learned counsel for the State.

2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Jamui, on a complaint made by respondent No.7, has directed the petitioner to file the admit card, in original based on which, she claims to have appeared at the Madhyama examination, and also for constitution of a Medical Board, to ascertain the age of the petitioner (working Sevika). This order dated 01.12.2017 is assailed by the petitioner in the instant proceedings .

3. The brief factual background is that on 19.12.2012, Center No. 152, Neema Mubarakpur in the Sabal Bigha Panchayat of Sikandara Block was advertised along with other centers for selection of Anganwari Sevika and Sahayika. The petitioner had applied. She was placed in the merit list at 1st position having merit marks 72. The respondent No.7 was placed at Serial No.2 with merit marks 69.8. The Respondent No.7 lodged a complaint alleging that the petitioner’s Madhyama Certificate is false. The petitioner appeared and the Madhyama certificate was verified and found to be genuine, as per report of the District Programme Officer, Jamui,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document