SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 847

P. B. BAJANTHRI
Faiyaz Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman.
For the Respondents: Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj.

P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:—

“(A) For issuance of appropriate writ/ order or direction quashing the order issued under memo no. 63 (Vidhi) dated 05.05.2019 by the respondent no. 5 the superintendent of police West Champaran Bettiah by which the representation dated 04.09.2019 for payment of 12% interest, on the salary from 17.05.1996 to 30.11.1998, under the liberty given by this Hon’ble Court, has been rejected without assigning any reasonable ground as Contained in Annexure-10 to this writ application.

(B) For issuance of appropriate writ/order or direction commanding the respondents to make payment of interest @ 12% P.a. to the petitioner on the amount Rs. 3,00,274/- the salary for the period from 17.05.1996 to 30.11.1998 which has been paid to the petitioner on 3.11.2018 after a delay of about 23 years under the order of this Hon’ble Court passed in C.W.J.C. no. 1632/2015 on 18.6.2018 as contained in Annexure-6 to this writ application.

(C) For any other relief or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top