P. B. BAJANTHRI
Faiyaz Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
P. B. Bajanthri, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:—
“(A) For issuance of appropriate writ/ order or direction quashing the order issued under memo no. 63 (Vidhi) dated 05.05.2019 by the respondent no. 5 the superintendent of police West Champaran Bettiah by which the representation dated 04.09.2019 for payment of 12% interest, on the salary from 17.05.1996 to 30.11.1998, under the liberty given by this Hon’ble Court, has been rejected without assigning any reasonable ground as Contained in Annexure-10 to this writ application.
(B) For issuance of appropriate writ/order or direction commanding the respondents to make payment of interest @ 12% P.a. to the petitioner on the amount Rs. 3,00,274/- the salary for the period from 17.05.1996 to 30.11.1998 which has been paid to the petitioner on 3.11.2018 after a delay of about 23 years under the order of this Hon’ble Court passed in C.W.J.C. no. 1632/2015 on 18.6.2018 as contained in Annexure-6 to this writ application.
(C) For any other relief or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.