ASHUTOSH KUMAR, ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Jay Shankar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Ashutosh Kumar, J.—Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, the learned senior Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the State.
2. The licence of the petitioner was suspended on 28.12.2018 on the ground of his having been made accused in a criminal case involving breach of Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
3. A show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 31.12.2018 for explaining his cause which he replied on 03.01.2019. Since then, no decision has been taken by the licensing authority and the licence of the petitioner remains under continued suspension.
4. Mr. N.K. Agrawal, the learned senior Advocate has drawn the attention of this Court to the requirement of passing a final order under Section 28 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 within 180 days of such issuance of notice as far as possible.
5. There does not appear to be any explanation for such delayed conclusion of proceedings against a licensee under Section 28 of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.
6. We take strong exception to such lethargic approach of the authorities concerned.
7. We, therefore, direct the licensing authority
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.