SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 755

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Prabhu Sankar Ray @ Prabhu Sankar @ Golu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kedar Jha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal.

Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.—Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court.

2. Heard Mr. Kedar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, learned APP for the State.

3. The petitioner in the present case is aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 08.07.2021 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Children Court, Darbhanga in Cr. Appeal No. 06 of 2021 whereby and whereunder the order dated 19.03.2021 declaring the petitioner a major passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board, Darbhanga in J.J.B. Case No. 482 of 2021 arising out of Baheri P.S. Case No. 268 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been affirmed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the impugned judgment and order on the solitary ground that the learned Juvenile Justice Board as well as the Appellate Court have wrongly taken into consideration the school admission register of the school from which the petitioner has passed his matriculation examination. It is h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top