JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Kirtikar pandey, learned counsel for revisionist and learned A.G.A. for State.

2. Perused the record.

3. This criminal revision has been filed challenging judgment and order dated 27.1.2021, passed by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C II, Ballia, in Misc. Application Criminal No. Nil of 2019, dated 29.3.2019 (Paper No.3 Kha), whereby aforesaid application filed by accused Vishal Sigh @ Pitarsan @ Vishal Kumar Singh, claiming therein that he be declared juvenile on the date of occurrence i.e. 4.11.2017 has been rejected.

4. Present Criminal Revision came up for admission on 19.3.2021 and this Court passed the following order:

"Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State.

The present revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the revisionist against the order dated 27.1.2021, passed by A.S.J./F.T.C.-II, Ballia, in S.T. No. 54 of 2018 (State vs. Vishal) arising out of Case Crime No. 745 of 2017 under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 304 IPC, Police Station Dokati, District Ballia whereby the application of the revisionist declaring himself to be juvenile, has been rejected.

The submission of counsel for the revisionist