Sanjay Kumar Gupta vs State of Bihar - 2021 Supreme(Pat) 1164

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1164

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Sanjay Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Siya Ram Shahi, Sanjay Kumar Tiwari (in 19205); Prince Kumar Mishra (in 22519, 22862, 23100, 3413, 5956); P. K. Shahi, Sr. Adv., Vipin Kumar (in 22700, 5253);Brisketu Sharan Pandey (in 22769); Vipin Kumar (in 24017); Mukesh Kumar (in 2046);
For the Respondents: M/s Lalit Kishore, Pawan Kumar, Prince Kumar Mishra (in 19205); Subhash Chandra Mishra (in 22519, 5956); Umesh Narayan Dubey (in 22700); Narendra Kumar (in 22769); Smt. Shilpa Singh (in 22862, 24017); Ram Vinay Pd. Singh (in 22862); Prabhat Ranjan Singh(in 23100); Smt. Binita Singh(in 3413); Kameshwar Kumar (in 5253); Amit Bhushan (in 2046);
For the BPSC : M/s Sanjay Pandey (in all); Nishant Kumar Jha (in 19205, 22519, 22700, 22769, 5253); Viksash Kumar (in 2046);
For the Interveners : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh (in 19205, 22519);
For Interveners : Md. Kamaluddin (in 22519);
For Intervener Nos. 7-18 : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh (in 22519);
For Intervener Nos. 26-30 : Mr. Siya Ram Shahi(in 22519);

Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J.—Heard Mr. Siya Ram Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 19205 of 2016. Mr. P. K. Shahi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in C.W.J.C. No. 22519 of 2018 and Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Bihar Public Service Commission.

2. C.W.J.C. No. 19205 of 2016 was filed by two petitioners challenging the Advertisement No. 06/2016 as well as validity of Rule. However, it was admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners before the Division Bench that validity of any rule framed under the Bihar Education Services Rules, 2014 is not under challenge and they are only challenging the validity of Advertisement no.06/2016 that the advertisement is contrary to the statutory rules and that is why these matters have been placed before the learned Single Bench.

3. On 21.08.2018, after hearing the parties a Coordinate Bench of this Court has passed the following orders:—

“Heard the parties.

The petitioners, in the present writ application, are aggrieved by the Advertisement No.06/2016, issued by the Bihar Public Service Commission in respect of appointment of Lecturer through a limited competitive exami

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Pat) 1164

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYSanjay Kumar Gupta – AppellantVersusState of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
Sanjay Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent