Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.5 at length.

2. On 28.08.2020, while issuing notice to Respondent No.5, this Court has stayed the order dated 03.07.2020 passed in Case No.HC-06 of 2019 by the Sub Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur. For vacating the aforesaid stay order, Respondent No.5 has filed an interlocutory application, bearing I.A. No.1 of 2020.

3. I deem it proper not to pass separate order on the interlocutory application, as with consent of all the parties appearing in this case, this writ petition has been heard finally for disposal at this stage itself.

4. By way of filing the present writ application, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 03.07.2020 (Annexure-8) in Case No. HC 06/2019, by which the petitioner was directed to vacate the premises of the Private Respondent No.5 within one month and also to pay him the outstanding dues of rent.

5. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition, in narrow compass, is that the petitioner for his business required a suitable premise and as such he and the Private Respondent No.5 (landlord) executed a rent