VIKASH JAIN
Chhote Lal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Vikash Jain, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner have been claimed in the writ petition—
i. For quashing of Memo No. 906 dated 26-5-2020, contained in ANN-11, issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Rajauli (For short: the SDO) cancelling License No. 195/2017, contained in ANN-1, which was issued for running a PDS Shop/Fair Price Shop.
ii. For a consequential direction commanding the respondents to restore the supply and distribution of petitioner's Fair Price Shop forthwith, the same being his only source of livelihood which has been snatched illegally, unconstitutionally & in complete malafide.”
3. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the petitioner's License No.11/2007 (corresponding to new Licence No.195/2017) was cancelled by order dated 12.01.2019 passed by the SDO, Rajauli. The said cancellation order
Parsauni Khirodhar Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society Ltd. vs. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.