RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Sudhir Kant Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner in the present case is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Bettiah (Town) P.S. Case No. 755 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 419/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Earlier while calling for the case diary, this Court granted interim protection to the petitioner. In this regard the order dated 04.12.2020 passed by this Court is being reproduced as under:—
“Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, learned APP for the State.
The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking prearrest bail in connection with Bettiah (Town) P.S. Case No. 755/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 419/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present case has been lodged at the instance of the District Welfare Office, West Champaran, Bettiah. Learned counsel submits tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.