SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 892

MADHURESH PRASAD
Usha Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra.
For the Respondents: Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav.

Madhuresh Prasad, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-State.

2. The instant proceedings is a second writ petition for grant of salary for the period 27.11.2009 to 31.07.2011 during the period in between termination of the petitioner’s earlier appointment on compassionate ground; and her reappointment under order dated 29-08-2011.

3. The writ petition reveals that the earlier termination of her services on compassionate ground was assailed by the petitioner earlier in CWJC No. 16458 of 2008. The same was allowed vide order dated 13.05.2010 with the following observations: –

“There appears to be no pleading that the petitioner had subsequently acquired the educational qualification as required under 1984, 1997 & 2002 Circulars. Since, one of the pleas is that the petitioner has not been issued a show cause notice before termination. I direct that the District Magistrate, Gaya and the District Establishment Committee, Gaya should issue a show cause to the petitioner and after hearing, pass an appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of filing show cause reply by the petitioner in view of the observations of this Cour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top