SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 70

SHAILENDRA SINGH
Mohan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sadanand Paswan.

Shailendra Singh, J. – Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Sadanand Paswan, learned APP for the State are present and they are heard.

2. No one appears on behalf of the respondent No.2 despite notice having been served upon the close relative of the said respondent No.2.

3. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.11.2021 and 01.12.2021 respectively passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 1st-cum-Special Judge (SC/ST), Bettiah, West Champaran in Session Trial Case No.654 of 2016 (arising out of Bettiah (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 559 of 2015) whereby and where-under the appellants have been held guilty and convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, (in short IPC) and under Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST (POA) Act and the appellants have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- under Section 323 of IPC and in default of making payment the appellants will be liable for simple imprisonment for one month, and under Section 341 of IPC they have been sentenced to pay fine of Rs.500/- a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top