SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 904

SUDHIR SINGH and SHAILENDRA SINGH, JJ.
Cr. WJC No.1435 of 2022
(13.12.2022)
Lallan Chouhan ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr.Indradeo Prasad.
For the Respondents: Mr.Lalit Kishore (A.G.).

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 226 – Writ of habeas corpus will lie only when order of remand is absolutely illegal, suffers from lack of jurisdiction or has been passed in an absolutely mechanical manner – While passing order of remand, court below has applied its judicial mind by taking into consideration records of case as well as case diary and has arrived at finding that there is sufficient reason for sending accused persons including petitioner into judicial custody – Order of remand is not mechanical and does not suffer from vice of illegality – Present habeas corpus writ application is not maintainable – However, petitioner is granted liberty to change subject matter of present writ application if he is aggrieved on account of order of remand being improper in eye of law. (Paras 11, 12 and 13)

ORDER

Sudhir Singh, J. – The petitioner in the present habeas corpus writ application prays for the following reliefs: –

^^(i) ukjnhxat Fkkuk dk.M la[;k 49/2022/P.T.N.-705/2022, èkkjk-8(b)(c), 20(9) (b) N.D.P.S. ,DV] 1985 esa ikfjr ekuuh; l= U;k;k/kh'k uoknk dk vkns'k fnukad 4-11-2022 dks voSèk ?kksf"kr fd;k tk;] ftlds }kjk vkosnd dh fxjrkjh dks fnukad 17-11-2022 rd vkxs cढ+k;h xbZ gSA

(ii) rnuqlkj] ukjnhxat Fkkuk dk.M la[;k 49/2022 P.T.N.- 705/2022 esa vkosnd dks dkjkxkj ds fujks/k ls Lora= djus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;A

(iii) dksbZ vU; vkns'k@funs'k@fjV tks vkosnd ds ekSfyd vf/kdkjksa dk izR;kofrZr djus ds fy, vko';d gks] mls ikfjr fd;k tk;sA

2. From perusal of the aforesaid reliefs sought for in the present habeas corpus writ application, it appears that the petitioner intends to challenge the order dated 04.11.2022 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Nawada in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No.49 of 2022 and declare the same to be illegal, by virtue of which the petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody till 17.11.2022. The petitioner, in consequence of the aforesaid relief, further prays for his release from the undergoing detention in connection with the present case.

3. The facts leading to filing of the present application is that a written report was filed by A.S.I. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, who happens to be the informant of the present case stating therein that on 04.03.2022 around 10 in the morning he received a secret information that six named accused persons including this petitioner are indulged in farming and trade of ganja. After informing his senior officials, the informant went to the channa-chatar village and saw that five to six persons were running trying to escape from their respective houses. The informant along with other police officials tried to apprehend them. However, by taking advantage of the dense population, the accused persons fled away.

4. The local residents of the village and the local chowkidar disclosed the name and other details of the persons, who were seen to be fleeing away. It is relevant to point out here that the name of the petitioner was also revealed by the local residents and chowkidar of the village. When the police requested the people who gathered at the spot, for becoming independent witnesses, nobody came forward and, as such, two chowkidars, who were part of the raiding party, were made witnesses. Thereafter the police searched the houses of the accused persons. During the search, two big plants of ganja were recovered from the land adjacent to the wall situated to the northern side of the house of the present petitioner. After uprooting the said ganja plants, its weight was found to be 7 kgs. From the property of other accused persons also, ganja plants were recovered. Consequently, Nardiganj P.S. case No.49/2022 was registered against the petitioner and five other accused persons under Sections 8(b)(c), 20(a)(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

5. In connection with the aforesaid P.S. case, the petitioner got arrested on 03.11.2022 from his house. From perusal of Annexure 3, it appears that a request was made to the District & Sessions Judge, Nawada by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Nardiganj, P.S., Nawada to send the petitioner into judicial custody for a fortnight.

6. The petitioner was sent into judicial custody till 17.11.2022 by order dated 04.11.2022 passed by the Sessions Judge, Nawada, which is under challenge in the present habeas corpus writ application.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in illegal custody, as the order by virtue of which he has been sent into judicial custody, has been passed in a mechanical manner and suffers from the vice of non-application of judicial mind. It has been argued that no reason has been assigned for sending the petitioner into judicial custody and, therefore, the order under challenge is nullity in the eye of law. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn our attention to the judgment rendered by




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top