SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 123

CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Hira Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh.
For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, GA-1.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Kumar, SC-1.

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J. – Heard, Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha GA-1, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as Mr. Vikas Kumar SC-1, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. This present writ application is being filed for following reliefs under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India: –

(i) For quashing of Gaighat (Benibad O.P.) P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 dated 10.02.2017 registered for offences under Sections 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 35(c) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Contained in Annexure-5 to the writ application)

(ii) For restraining Respondents from interfering in the trade of the petitioner in the garb of regulating the business in exercise of power conferred under Bihar Excise Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

(iii) For any other relief (s) for which the petitioner found entitled too.

3. As gathered from the fact of this case, it appears that petitioner has obtained distributorship of products manufactured by M/s D.D. Food

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top