SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Pat) 916

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Chandradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Dr. Binay Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP-5.

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, learned AC to GP-5 for the State.

2. In this writ application, the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs: –

“(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashment of Memo no. 2062 dated 28.07.2022 issued by office of respondent no. 6 whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been informed that respondent no. 3 who is chariman of Special Security Committee, Bihar has turned down the application of the petitioner for providing Body guard.

(ii) For a direction upon respondent no.3 to consider the recommendations of respondents no. 9, 8, 7, 6 and 5 for making available bodyguard to the petitioner considering threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioner on payment basis.

(iii) For holding that in the absence of personal security the life and property of the petitioner who is an up and coming businessman in Begusarai running factories at Barauni Industrial Estate is in imminent danger from criminals round the clock.

(iv) For holding that the state is bound to protect the life and liberty of ever human being whether a citizen or otherwise and it can not permit any body to threatened anoth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top