SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 193

SANDEEP KUMAR
Veena Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Rakesh Kumar Sharma.
For the Opp. Parties : Mr.Sri Ram Bilash Roy Raman.

Sandeep Kumar, J. –

Ref. I.A. No. 01 of 2023.

I.A. No. 01. of 2023 has been filed for challenging the order dated 28.07.2022 by which cognizance of offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 01. of 2023 is allowed.

2. The prayer for quashing is treated as a part of the main prayer.

3. This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 28.07.2022 and the entire prosecution of the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 1475 © of 2017.

The prosecution story in brief is given hereinbelow: –

The opposite party no. 2 namely Ajeet Kumar has filed a complaint before the learned CJM, Begusarai alleging therein in that he was previously posted on the post of Junior Engineer, Manrega and at that time Veena Kumari (Petitioner) was the Programme Officer (Manrega) Baliya Prakhand. During her tenure, she misappropriated the government money and defalcated the amount of different schemes. During her work period of social forestry has been done under Manrega in Scheme No. 01/09-10, Scheme No. 02/09-10, Scheme No. 06/09- 10, Scheme No. 12/10-11, Scheme No. 26/10-11 and Scheme No. 27/10-11. He further alleged that Veena Kumari withdr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top