SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 400

PURNENDU SINGH
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh.
For the Respondents: M/s Radhika Raman (C.G.C.), Ram Tujabh Singh.

ORDER

Heard Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Radhika Raman and Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. Present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:—

“(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/ order/ direction directing Respondents authorities to regularise the service of petitioner on the post of Lecturer, pursuant to law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court, as the petitioner is continuously discharging his duty as Lecturer on sanctioned vacant post, since the date of his appointment/joining on said post on 06/11/2001, on contractual basis, pursuant to Office order issued by Respondent no.5 vide letter no. 2(xxviii)/Estt/78/ dated 03/11/2001.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction commanding Respondent authorities to fix and make payment of difference amount of arrear as well as current salary at the rate of salary fixed for the post of Lecturer working in regular pay scale as the petitioner having requisite qualification is performing similar work on a duly vacant sanctioned post on consolidated salary since his appointment by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top