SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 310

MADHURESH PRASAD
Anish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh.
For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to G.P.-4.

Madhuresh Prasad, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned State Counsel.

2. By way of instant writ proceedings, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 22.10.2008 of the District Magistrate, Nalanda, whereby and whereunder the punishment of withholding of two increments with non-cumulative effect and forfeiture of salary for the period of suspension 28.08.2006 to 22.10.2008 has been awarded. The petitioner has also assailed the appellate order dated 29.03.2011 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Patna in Service Appeal Case No.12 of 2009, rejecting the petitioner's appeal and affirming the punishment.

3. The brief factual matrix is arising from issuance of charge memo on Prapatra-`K'. The same is dated 04.10.2006 (Annexure 4), communicated to the petitioner on 30.11.2006. The same contains a charge that the petitioner has issued rent receipts for a piece of land in favour of two persons and thereby created a dispute. The charge memo based on these facts alleges that the petitioner has indulged in favouritism towards the two persons and had demonstrated negligence and dereliction of duty as well as lack of discipline in discharge of his duties.

4.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top