SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 180

ANSHUMAN
Yogendra Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Akhilesh Dutta Verma.
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (AAG5).

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Learned counsel Mr. Akhilesh Dutta Verma for the petitioner and counsel for State present.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for setting aside the order dated 13.10.2020 issued vide Memo No. 4125 whereby and whereunder 100% pension and gratuity has been forfeited and also for payment of full consequential benefit by way of arrear of salary and others on and from 06.06.2014, to restore the pension of the petitioner from the salary and on from the date of his retirement i.e. 31.01.2020 and further for appropriate direction to the respondent to restore the full consequential benefits by way of payment of arrears of salary on and from 06.06.2014 or for grant of any other order which may deem fit and proper.

3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was joined as a Supply Inspector in the Department of Food and Consumer Protection on 21.11.1989. On 02.08.2009, the D.M. Gopalganj directed to the petitioner to file an F.I.R. against one supplier Mohammad Nizamudin who by way of committing forgery enrolled 19 different names as registered supplier about which a report was received fro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top