SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 255

ANSHUMAN
Rama Nand Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Shankar Kumar Choudhary.
For the Respondent: Mr. Raj Kishore Roy.

Dr. Anshuman, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed for directing the respondent authority to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 18.09.2018 (Annexure-2) filed in terms of the Right to Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013 for determination of the amount of compensation awarded in favour of the petitioner against his land appertaining to Khata No. 205, new Khesra No. 1094, 1094A, and 1095 (old Khesra No.1120 and new Khesra 1095 old no. 1074 respectively, situated at Village -Mahinathpur, P.S. Bharibsthan, District- Madhubani which has been taken for broadening and realignment NH-57.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is son of Lilanand Choudnary and in whose name letter has been issued from the Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani. He further submits that the petitioner had received part payment but due to death of his father he could not receive the full payment towards compensation and, therefore, the money towards compensation is still lying with the District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top